Am i the only one who thinks that the father did not rape the children or at least not raped theo? that time cedric finally killed his father, it's not bc he found out that the father was raping theo, he was afraid his father would eventually drag back theo in and kill him so he no longer had the luxury to wait for the poison to work and had to immediately kill him. And when his father said theo had to take his mother's role, i think that's just as an accomplice. There also wasn't really any evidence like removed clothes to the victims, i don't think that's smth the author would just forget if their point is that he was sexually abused. And what's the point of keeping that vague? And when cedric read his father's journal, you would think that also includes theo's SA, but reading the journal did not trigger him fast tracking the death of their father so i don't think it really happened
wait a minute yall...let them cook we getting that character development bit by bit. (seo-in had to be either blackmailed or forced to kiss that dude cause AINT NO MF WAY)
Am i the only one who thinks that the father did not rape the children or at least not raped theo? that time cedric finally killed his father, it's not bc he found out that the father was raping theo, he was afraid his father would eventually drag back theo in and kill him so he no longer had the luxury to wait for the poison to work and had to immediately kill him. And when his father said theo had to take his mother's role, i think that's just as an accomplice. There also wasn't really any evidence like removed clothes to the victims, i don't think that's smth the author would just forget if their point is that he was sexually abused. And what's the point of keeping that vague? And when cedric read his father's journal, you would think that also includes theo's SA, but reading the journal did not trigger him fast tracking the death of their father so i don't think it really happened
fck this sht im sick and needs to rest but instead im writing this fucking essay